Understood. No objection from here.
Yours,
Joel
On 1/17/2013 5:27 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
On 2012-12-12 09:44, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
Thanks for the Review,
On 2012-12-12 02:02, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
This (and the companion document draft-ietf-6man-udpzero) seem ready for
publication to me.
I do have a minor questions. It is sufficiently minor that if necessary
it may be ignored so publication can proceed.
I section 5, bullet 3 talks about "tunnel protocol will not
significantly increase the rate of corruption of the inner packet", and
then talks about needing to use additional integrity verification if
there is a risk of such increased corruption. My question is, what kind
of encapsulating protocol would or could, by its nature, create such a
risk? It is not at all clear to me what a protocol designer should be
watching for.
The one think we have determined could cause increased corruption is
tunnels that fragment. That is discussed in the document in Section
3.1.5 but not explicitly linked to this bullet.
To make it clear we are not planing to make any changes to UDPZERO-08 to
address this comment. Objections?
Cheers
Magnus Westerlund
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
