2013-02-03 à 20:39, Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> : > > > On 2/3/2013 2:36 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> On 03/02/2013 17:26, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >>> To a significant degree Randy, I agree with you in your comment about >>> magic bits. If I were designing IPv6 from scratch (counter-factual in >>> so may ways at once) I would not do it that way. >>> >>> But, unless there is an actual problem with the design the IETF has >>> adopted, I am reluctant to change it "just because". >> >> Which is why the draft actually proposes nothing that would change >> any running code. >> >> Brian > > But it does propose to change the spec. Why? What problem does changing the > spec solve?
Same question. RD > > Yours, > Joel > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
