Bob, On 03/05/2013 07:42 PM, Bob Hinden wrote: > >> draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier : 2 discussion on the list : >> 15 mins > > This was the chairs call as we thought there would be interest in it. > Given the discussion on the list, there appears to be more interest > in <draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt> and we propose to > swap them. There isn't time for everything. > > Comments?
I personally oppose to such idea. This is my reasoning: * draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier has already been in the position of "this will be discussed if time permits" (and at the time, time didn't permit). Hence it's time to allocate a slot to this I-D. The same reasoning should apply to draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt for the next IETF meeting. * draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier is pretty much straight-forward so that may be one reason for which you didn't see more discussion about it. I'd expect that discussion during the 6man wg meeting will be brief, and hence we'll be able to move forward to the next document even before the allocated time is used. * Changing agendas once published is, IMO, a bad idea (unless really necessary). FWIW, I should note that I do support draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt -- i.e., the reasoning above doesn't have anything to do with the contents of draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt itself. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
