>> >> >> IMHO These proposed solutions are all orthogonal, and are therefore best >> defined in independent standards (that use each other as normative >> references). > > Exactly. I think that draft-ietf-6man-ug clarifies this to some extent, > as a side-effect of clarifying the U/G bits. Would it be useful to add > an extra sentence in that draft, simply stating that a number of > independent methods for forming an IID can exist?
Perhaps also referencing Appendix A of RFC4291. Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
