I happen to agree that a change like this would be a good change, but I also 
agree that it needs to be done as a consensus document, not as an erratum.   
This is true not only for process reasons, but because I think the change as 
proposed was too broad.   Is there a working group alive where this could get 
done?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to