>> I happen to agree that a change like this would be a good change, but I also >> agree that it needs to be done as a consensus document, not as an erratum. >> This is true not only for process reasons, but because I think the change as >> proposed was too broad. Is there a working group alive where this could >> get done? >> > > 6MAN.
I'm fine with 6man owning given that we produced RFC6874. if the intention here is to use zoneids in referrals (or even link-locals) then there has to be involvement from the apps area. cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
