On 2June2013Sunday, at 15:51, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 03/06/2013 10:31, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: >> The kind of painfully obvious solution, especially when we consider the >> effects of the much-ballyhooed "Internet of Things," is that we have to >> allow for prefixes > /64. >> >> It's not just home nets. What about automobile nets, or more generically, >> "vehicle nets"? Are we going to try to rationalize why every vehicle on the >> road, sea, or sky should also be given a /48, > > Why is this an issue, since there are 15 trillion of them available? > > Yes, of course I know about H ratios, but deploying a few billion /48s > under some thousands of PA prefixes is well within a prudent policy. > > Brian
and operationally, there is no problem whatsoever with all that extra 'dark space" being advertised - makes a fine environment for DDoS launches. /48's are a horrible policy - one should only advertise what one is actually using. /bill -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------