> On 2June2013Sunday, at 16:47, Sander Steffann wrote: > >> On 03/06/2013 11:06, manning bill wrote: >>> /48's are a horrible policy - one should only advertise what one is >>> actually using. >> >> Now *that* would cause a nice fragmented DFZ... >> Sander > > I'm going to inject a route. One route. why do you care if its a /9, a > /28, a /47, or a /121? Its -one- route. > That one route covers everything I'm going to use… and nothing I'm not.
That is very optimistic. If I'm using 11 /64s in my networks then I'll at least have to announce 3 routes (/67, /65, /64), otherwise I'll announcing more space than I'm actually using... - Sander -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
