I can confirm that the 01 version does address all of my comments, and I
now support.

Thanks,
RayH

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> If you're following the current discussion on v6ops, it
> seems that we need to decide whether to proceed with the
> subject draft, so that there is at least a marker for what
> forwarding nodes are supposed to do about extension headers.
>
> So, are there any more comments on the draft?
>
>    Brian
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This version is intended to respond to Ray Hunter's comments.
>> There are two important changes:
>>
>> 1. The MUST NOT that Ray mentioned is now SHOULD NOT. Really
>> this is a matter of internal consistency in the document, since
>> the exceptions to the SHOULD NOT are specified, so the MUST NOT
>> was inappropriate.
>>
>> 2. It is now made explicit that only standards-track extension
>> headers are covered. That knocks out HIP, which is Experimental.
>>
>> There are a few other changes of editorial nature.
>>
>>    Brian + Sheng
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-01.txt
>> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:21:08 -0700
>> From: internet-drafts at ietf.org
>> To: i-d-announce at ietf.org
>> CC: ipv6 at ietf.org
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>> directories.
>>  This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>>      Title           : Transmission of IPv6 Extension Headers
>>      Author(s)       : Brian Carpenter
>>                           Sheng Jiang
>>      Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-01.txt
>>      Pages           : 9
>>      Date            : 2013-05-29
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    Various IPv6 extension headers have been standardised since the IPv6
>>    standard was first published.  This document updates RFC 2460 to
>>    clarify how intermediate nodes should deal with such extension
>>    headers and with any that are defined in future.  It also specifies
>>    how extension headers should be registered by IANA, with a
>>    corresponding minor update to RFC 2780.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-01
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-01
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to