On Jun 6, 2013 8:58 PM, "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com> wrote:
> While my statements in this forum are my opinion alone and not intended to represent ARIN or the AC, I think I bring a pretty good knowledge of both the letter and the intent of the policies as they exist today. Thus, it should be easy for you to point out where the policy says this. And easier to point to a discussion about the intent. > If you claim you gave a customer a /48 and the customer reports that they are not allowed to exercise control over the use of that /48, then, you have not, in fact, delegated authority over that /48 as you have claimed to ARIN and that is, in fact, resource fraud in violation of ARIN policy. I'm not sure why you think this is an absurd claim. While the customer may be allowed to use their prefix where and how they please, the policy says nothing about forcing the ISP to route everything everywhere. The ISP would not disallow usage in any way, they would simply not route according to arbitrary whims which are against their semantic policy. As an aside, handing out /56 per customer and semantic unit will most likely solve any real world problems. And if the customer really needs more than 256 semantic contexts, or more than 256 /64 per semantic context, the LIR can probably document and prove the need for more than a /48... Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
