On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote:
> If you claim you gave a customer a /48 and the customer reports that > they are not allowed to exercise control over the use of that /48, then, > you have not, in fact, delegated authority over that /48 as you have > claimed to ARIN and that is, in fact, resource fraud in violation of ARIN > policy. I'm not sure why you think this is an absurd claim. > > > Because you haven't cited a policy that substantiates it, despite claiming > to have written the policy that would say this. > What about the APNIC policy I cited a few emails ago? You have not explained why you think it supports your point of view that using semantic bits does not make it harder for ISPs to assign /48s to users.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
