Hi Fred,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 4:12 PM
> To: Tore Anderson
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg
> Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-
> deprecate-00.txt
> 
> 
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 2:29 AM, Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> wrote:
> > - When a SIIT translator receives an IPv4 packet with DF=0 that would
> > result in an IPv6 packet that would exceed the IPv6 link MTU, it will
> > split the original packet into IPv6 fragments.
> 
> It *could* fragment the IPv4 packet and send it in two unfragmented
> IPv6 packets.
> 
> > I cannot support your draft until it discusses or provides solutions
> for
> > the above considerations.
> 
> I'm in a similar case with respect to protocols above IPv6 (OSPF and
> NFS/UDP come quickly to mind) that depend on fragmentation to deal with
> the issue. I think the Robustness Principle tells us that such
> applications SHOULD figure out how to live with PMTU, but it also tells
> us that we can't deprecate fragmentation unless all known instances
> that depend on it have defined practical work-arounds. I suspect that
> this would imply the re-creation of the fragmentation feature in an
> intermediate protocol,

That is essentially what SEAL does - it provides an intermediate-level
segmentation and reassembly capability that avoids the pitfalls of IP
fragmentation.

> which seems like a lot of work with little real gain.

It's not that bad, and IMHO worth it.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to