On 23/07/2013 09:12, Mark ZZZ Smith wrote: > Hi, > > Firstly, I support advancing this draft. > > Some suggested changes: > > " This has no known harmful effect as long as the > replicated MAC addresses and IIDs are used on different layer 2 > links. If they are used on the same link, of course there will be a > problem, to be detected by duplicate address detection [RFC4862], but > such a problem can usually only be resolved by human intervention." > > I think it would be worth pointing out that the link layer is most likely to > fail to operate with duplicate link layer addresses, before DAD has a chance > to detect duplicate IPv6 addresses.
OK. > > " Also, there is > evidence from the field that IEEE MAC addresses with "u" = 0 are > sometime incorrectly assigned to multiple MAC interfaces. Firstly, > there are recurrent reports of manufacturers assigning the same MAC > address to multiple devices. Secondly, significant re-use of the > same virtual MAC address is reported in virtual machine environments. " > > I found this text a bit confusing. The '"u" = 0' term read like it was > referring to locally unique IEEE MAC addresses ("unique equals no"), and then > the 2nd sentence is referring to globally unique (but duplicated and > therefore not actually globally unique) MAC addresses, u = 1 in an IPv6 IID, > the opposite of what the previous sentence was referring to. Then the third > sentence seems to be describing to what the first sentence was referring to. > I think the cause of the confusion might be that IEEE use the "locally > assigned" bit to distinguish locally generated or not (i.e., "l" = 0 for > globally unique), where as IPv6 IIDs have renamed it to "u" bit when the > value is inverted. I'd suggest trying to ensure the IEEE terminology is used > when IEEE addresses are discussed to make it clearer what the properties of > the IEEE address are. Yep. I remember complaining when the bit inversion was first proposed that it would lead to years of confusion. Which IEEE standard is the basic reference for their terminology? Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------