I have reviewed the document; in my opinion it is ready to be sent to the IESG.
I suggest that RFC 6775 (6LoWPAN-ND) be mentioned in section 4 along with draft-ietf-6man-dad-proxy as a way in which "the scope of DAD may be extended to a set of links." For completeness, RFC 6775 could be cited along with RFC 4862 in section 1.2. - Ralph On Jul 18, 2013, at 6:11 PM 7/18/13, Bob Hinden <bob.hin...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing: > > Title : Significance of IPv6 Interface Identifiers > Author(s) : Brian Carpenter > Sheng Jiang > Filename : draft-ietf-6man-ug-01.txt > Pages : 11 > Date : 2013-05-24 > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-ug-01 > > as a Proposed Standard. Substantive comments and statements of support for > advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial > suggestions can be sent to the author. This last call will end on 1 August > 2013. > > The chairs would also like to solicit a few people to do a detailed review of > this document. Please contact the chairs directly. > > Regards, > > Bob Hinden & Ole Trøan > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
