Russ Edmonds wrote: > *** What Paul has been trying to say is that a license is granted > for a > city which the station intends to cover. Neither the transmitter nor > the studios are required to be in that town. The fact that a military > base may be in itself a town or not is not really relevant, and since > nothing to do with the stationsis on the base ( except for its > signal ) > there's no need for any permissions.
We seem to be going around in circles on this. If a station's tower is on a military base, it would seem to me that a lease with some government entity would be required. "Permission to build a tower" would be implied in such a lease. Perhaps what everyone is trying to say is the fact that the FCC isn't concerned the tower or studios are as long as the city of license is covered with the required amount of signal. Pete Taylor Tacoma, WA 12225w 4719n ICF2010 + Kiwa air core loop DX398; Palomar loop _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
