Hi Mark,

Is there some recommended way to go about contacting [email protected]? Do I need to be subscribed to it (and would I subscribe using [email protected])?

Thx
Dan


On 06/10/2010 18:23, Mark Struberg wrote:
If we are _not_ distributing this project but only _using_ it, then it would be 
no problem at all. LGPL projects might be used this way.

Of course, if he kindly gave us permission to relicense it under ASL, then we 
might also package it into our distribution bundles.

Not 100% sure though whether/where we need to put this on file.
I'd say we contact [email protected], just to be sure.

LieGrue,
strub


--- On Wed, 10/6/10, Dan Haywood<[email protected]>  wrote:

From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Re: XmlHttpRequest licensing
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 4:51 PM







   Dear mentors,



     I've realized that one of my sister projects (restful objects) has a
     dependency on some LGPL software.



     Per the email chain below, I contacted the developer, Sergey
     Ilinsky, who has granted us permission with the words below:



     Yes, I authorize "NO framework and your sister projects accepted
       [2] into the Apache incubator" to use my XMLHttpRequest.js library
       (available at the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/
       and currently licensed under LGPL) with the ASL license.



     Does this make sense legally, and is it enough to put on file?   Or
     would he need to formally license his software under ASL from his
     main website (and if he's not happy, then I'd need to yank it and
     use something else instead).



     Thanks,

     Dan





     -------- Original Message --------



           Subject:
           Re: XmlHttpRequest licensing


           Date:
           Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:46:26 +0100


           From:
           Dan Haywood<[email protected]>


           Reply-To:

           [email protected]


           Organization:

           Haywood Associates Ltd.


           To:
           Sergey Ilinsky<[email protected]>










     Sergey,

     Thank you very much for your prompt reply, and for granting us this
     permission.



     I'm still learning the ropes at Apache, so I'll need to double check
     that the statement below suffices (and legally makes sense) but I
     would hope it would.



     ~~~

     Just had a quick glance at your Ample SDK; I'm always on the lookout
     for new frameworks that target the UI experience.  It might work
     quite well as an alternative default front-end for my restful
     interface.  Just added it to the Isis wiki.  But whatever, good luck
     with build up a community for it.



     Thanks again,

     Dan

     ----------------



     On 06/10/2010 17:18, Sergey Ilinsky wrote:


         Dan,



         Yes, I authorize "NO framework and your sister projects accepted
         [2] into the Apache incubator" to use my XMLHttpRequest.js
         library (available at the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/
         and currently licensed under LGPL) with the ASL license.



         BTW, you may be interested in looking into another project
           I recently started - Ample SDK, Open-Source JavaScript GUI
           Framework http://www.amplesdk.com
           There are already several businesses using it for their
           benefit!



         Sergey/










           On 6 October 2010 18:10, Dan Haywood
             <[email protected]>
             wrote:


                Hi Sergey,

                 I came across your XMLHttpRequest a while back while
                 writing my book [1] on the Java Naked Objects framework
                 (perhaps you've heard of it, but then again, perhaps
                 not) and incorporated it into some companion "sister"
                 project to expose a RESTful interface to an NO domain
                 model.



                 Fast forward a year, and we've had the NO framework and
                 my sister projects accepted [2] into the Apache
                 incubator.



                 Anyway... one of the requirements for Apache is that all
                 dependencies must be ASL or equivalent.  I see that
                 you've changed the license on XMLHttpRequest from GPL to
                 LGPL, but LGPL doesn't quite cut-it for Apache.



                 So, my question is... would you be willing to further
                 change your license from LGPL to ASL?  Otherwise I guess
                 I'll need to reimplement, but it's a shame to do so
                 given such a good piece of work is already out there.



                 Many thanks,

                 Dan Haywood



                 [1] http://pragprog.com/titles/dhnako

                 [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal.



                 --

                    Dan Haywood



                           consultant, mentor,
                             developer, author


                           agile, ddd, oo, java,
                             .net, sybase


                           MA, MBCS, CITP, CEng



                           mail: [email protected]



                           book: Domain Driven Design using
                               Naked Objects


                           blog: http://danhaywood.com



                           linked in: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/dkhaywood



                           twitter: http://twitter.com/dkhaywood



                           sybase: http://sybtraining.co.uk



















Reply via email to