Ooooops I was thinking about *Dan* but my hands wrote something else :D. On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi... > > Dave wdyt about Benson's suggestion ? > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Guys, >> >> Apache CXF has an XMLHttpRequest support library in Javascript, 100% AL. >> >> jQuery is dual-licensed already MIT/GPL, and MIT is acceptable as a >> dependency for a scripting language. So why not just use one of those. >> >> ? >> >> --benson >> >> >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:22 AM, dan haywood >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Working towards our release. One of our dependencies was licensed LGPL, >>> which the ASF does not view as compatible with ASLv2. Last year I >>> corresponded with the author of that dependency; per the email chain below >>> you can see that he has agreed to dual-license his code under both LGPL and >>> ASLv2. >>> >>> Since his website has not been updated, I'm forwarding this correspondence >>> to this list in order that it can be referenced in the archives. (His email >>> is freely available on the web, so I haven't bothered to obscure it). >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Sergey Ilinsky <[email protected]> >>> Date: 14 October 2010 10:11 >>> Subject: Re: XmlHttpRequest licensing >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> OK. >>> >>> I confirm that I now dual license my XMLHttpRequest.js library (available at >>> the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/) under both the Apache License >>> 2.0 and the LGPL. >>> >>> Sergey/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On 14 October 2010 00:04, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sergey, >>>> Yes, sorry to be creating this hassle for you. Answers within. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13/10/2010 22:04, Sergey Ilinsky wrote: >>>> >>>> Could you tell me directly: >>>> 1) what license will work for your project >>>> >>>> The most straightforward is Apache's own, ie: Apache License 2.0. There's >>>> more discussion of other valid licenses at [1] >>>> >>>> >>>> 2) if the license attribution provided in writing in email is sufficient >>>> >>>> Yes it is. You could simply say: >>>> >>>> *I confirm that I now license my XMLHttpRequest.js library (available at >>>> the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/) under the Apache License 2.0 >>>> * >>>> or you could say (if you didn't want to be bothered updating your website): >>>> >>>> *I confirm that I now **dual license my XMLHttpRequest.js library >>>> (available at the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/) under both the >>>> Apache License 2.0 and the LGPL. >>>> * >>>> >>>> Hope that helps, I appreciate your time. >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a. >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > Author of (WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 2.0 User Guide) > http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247585.html > - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour > - Blog: http://tadabborat.blogspot.com > ---- > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" > - Albert Einstein > > "Writing clean code is what you must do in order to call yourself a > professional. There is no reasonable excuse for doing anything less > than your best." > - Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship > > "Stay hungry, stay foolish." > - Steve Jobs >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour Author of (WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 2.0 User Guide) http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247585.html - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour - Blog: http://tadabborat.blogspot.com ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein "Writing clean code is what you must do in order to call yourself a professional. There is no reasonable excuse for doing anything less than your best." - Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship "Stay hungry, stay foolish." - Steve Jobs
