Hi... Dave wdyt about Benson's suggestion ?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > > Apache CXF has an XMLHttpRequest support library in Javascript, 100% AL. > > jQuery is dual-licensed already MIT/GPL, and MIT is acceptable as a > dependency for a scripting language. So why not just use one of those. > > ? > > --benson > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:22 AM, dan haywood > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Working towards our release. One of our dependencies was licensed LGPL, >> which the ASF does not view as compatible with ASLv2. Last year I >> corresponded with the author of that dependency; per the email chain below >> you can see that he has agreed to dual-license his code under both LGPL and >> ASLv2. >> >> Since his website has not been updated, I'm forwarding this correspondence >> to this list in order that it can be referenced in the archives. (His email >> is freely available on the web, so I haven't bothered to obscure it). >> >> Dan >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Sergey Ilinsky <[email protected]> >> Date: 14 October 2010 10:11 >> Subject: Re: XmlHttpRequest licensing >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> OK. >> >> I confirm that I now dual license my XMLHttpRequest.js library (available at >> the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/) under both the Apache License >> 2.0 and the LGPL. >> >> Sergey/ >> >> >> >> On 14 October 2010 00:04, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Sergey, >>> Yes, sorry to be creating this hassle for you. Answers within. >>> >>> >>> On 13/10/2010 22:04, Sergey Ilinsky wrote: >>> >>> Could you tell me directly: >>> 1) what license will work for your project >>> >>> The most straightforward is Apache's own, ie: Apache License 2.0. There's >>> more discussion of other valid licenses at [1] >>> >>> >>> 2) if the license attribution provided in writing in email is sufficient >>> >>> Yes it is. You could simply say: >>> >>> *I confirm that I now license my XMLHttpRequest.js library (available at >>> the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/) under the Apache License 2.0 >>> * >>> or you could say (if you didn't want to be bothered updating your website): >>> >>> *I confirm that I now **dual license my XMLHttpRequest.js library >>> (available at the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/) under both the >>> Apache License 2.0 and the LGPL. >>> * >>> >>> Hope that helps, I appreciate your time. >>> Dan >>> >>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a. >>> >>> >> > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour Author of (WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 2.0 User Guide) http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247585.html - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour - Blog: http://tadabborat.blogspot.com ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein "Writing clean code is what you must do in order to call yourself a professional. There is no reasonable excuse for doing anything less than your best." - Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship "Stay hungry, stay foolish." - Steve Jobs
