[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3915?focusedWorklogId=982322&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-982322
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-3915:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 08/Sep/25 17:04
            Start Date: 08/Sep/25 17:04
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: gemmellr commented on code in PR #5908:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5908#discussion_r2330839328


##########
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/view/ConsumerField.java:
##########
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ public enum ConsumerField {
    CLIENT_ID("clientID"),
    LOCAL_ADDRESS("localAddress"),
    REMOTE_ADDRESS("remoteAddress"),
+   PROXY_ADDRESS("proxyAddress"),
+   PROXY_VERSION("proxyVersion"),

Review Comment:
   They might, but doesnt necessarily make it a great idea. I probably wouldnt 
have put remoteAddress on the consumer either personally, but it at least 
stands a much greater chance of actually differing between consumers, or being 
populated at all, versus these new values.





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 982322)
    Time Spent: 4h 40m  (was: 4.5h)

> Support PROXY Protocol
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-3915
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3915
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>            Reporter: João Santos
>            Assignee: Justin Bertram
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 4h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> [HAProxy|http://www.haproxy.org/] is a widely known and used TCP Load 
> Balancer and especially useful for an ActiveMQ Artemis clustered environment.
> Although possible to functionally implement with both products current 
> features, Artemis does not support the PROXY protocol, which prevents it's 
> broker nodes from inferring the real remote client IP address when behind an 
> HAProxy instance.
> Since Netty sockets implementation already seems to support this protocol 
> (discussed w/ [~jbertram] on DEV mailing list), it shouldn't be a big leap to 
> adding support for the protocol on Artemis acceptors, thus improving the 
> deployment of the use case at hand.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to