[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15986670#comment-15986670
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6337:
---------------------------------------

Github user zhijiangW commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3785#discussion_r113703927
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/partition/ResultPartition.java
 ---
    @@ -351,15 +351,15 @@ public void destroyBufferPool() {
        /**
         * Returns the requested subpartition.
         */
    -   public ResultSubpartitionView createSubpartitionView(int index, 
BufferProvider bufferProvider, BufferAvailabilityListener availabilityListener) 
throws IOException {
    +   public ResultSubpartitionView createSubpartitionView(int index, 
BufferAvailabilityListener availabilityListener) throws IOException {
                int refCnt = pendingReferences.get();
     
                checkState(refCnt != -1, "Partition released.");
                checkState(refCnt > 0, "Partition not pinned.");
     
                checkElementIndex(index, subpartitions.length, "Subpartition 
not found.");
     
    -           ResultSubpartitionView readView = 
subpartitions[index].createReadView(bufferProvider, availabilityListener);
    +           ResultSubpartitionView readView = 
subpartitions[index].createReadView(bufferPool, availabilityListener);
    --- End diff --
    
    Thank you for so efficient reviews! 
    I agree with your suggestion. It will be more complete and pretty good. 
    I will modify and submit another commit for it, and verify the tests again.


> Remove the buffer provider from PartitionRequestServerHandler
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6337
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6337
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network
>            Reporter: zhijiang
>            Assignee: zhijiang
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, {{PartitionRequestServerHandler}} will create a 
> {{LocalBufferPool}} when the channel is registered. The {{LocalBufferPool}} 
> is only used to get segment size for creating read view in 
> {{SpillableSubpartition}}, and the buffers in the pool will not be used all 
> the time, so it will waste the buffer resource of global pool.
> We would like to remove the {{LocalBufferPool}} from the 
> {{PartitionRequestServerHandler}}, and the {{LocalBufferPool}} in 
> {{ResultPartition}} can also provide the segment size for creating sub 
> partition view.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to