[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13907232#comment-13907232
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-10573:
----------------------------------------
bq. I'm curious about the decision to use Netty's classes here
Call it an investigation.
- We use Netty already
- Composite buffers
- Arena allocation
- Dynamic buffer resizing
- Reference counting
- Dev and testing by another community
bq. I looked at Netty's ByteBuf a while back and found it didn't support
instance reuse, thus was insufficient for his requirement. Did I miss something?
If that is the most important consideration above all else, outweighing all
positives, then you did not miss something.
What specifically would you suggest in the alternative?
> Use Netty 4
> -----------
>
> Key: HBASE-10573
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10573
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: hbase-10191
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Attachments: 10573.patch
>
>
> Pull in Netty 4 and sort out the consequences.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
