[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13907298#comment-13907298
]
Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-10573:
--------------------------------------
bq. Voodoo is kind of nonspecific as far as implementation strategy
descriptions go.
Agreed. I'm happy to share my experiment (in a more appropriate place than this
Netty ticket perhaps), but here's a
[gist|https://gist.github.com/ndimiduk/9120342].
bq. Isn't this undesirable? Unsafe is a vendor specific extension.
Yes, in the long term. My understanding is that the OpenJDK is moving to make
some of these facilities more accessible. The timeline appears to be for Java9
or later, as far as I can tell. I think it would be reasonable to consider use
of Unsafe for any short-medium term implementation.
bq. Don't the "native" ByteBuffer method calls tend not to be inlined?
Unknown.
bq. Great, let's proceed.
Yes, please proceed! I'll discontinue my conjecture and instead have a look at
your work ;)
> Use Netty 4
> -----------
>
> Key: HBASE-10573
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10573
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: hbase-10191
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Attachments: 10573.patch
>
>
> Pull in Netty 4 and sort out the consequences.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
