[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13115115#comment-13115115
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-4448:
-------------------------------
I think the following method should be enhanced to deal with the test which
uses more than one cluster whose numbers of slaves are the same:
{code}
+ protected synchronized HBaseTestingUtility getMiniClusterImpl(int slaves)
throws Exception {
{code}
This can be done in another JIRA.
> HBaseTestingUtilityFactory - pattern for re-using HBaseTestingUtility
> instances across unit tests
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4448
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Doug Meil
> Assignee: Doug Meil
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HBaseTestingUtilityFactory.java,
> hbase_hbaseTestingUtility_uses_2011_09_22.xlsx, java_HBASE_4448.patch
>
>
> Setting up and tearing down HBaseTestingUtility instances in unit tests is
> very expensive. On my MacBook it takes about 10 seconds to set up a
> MiniCluster, and 7 seconds to tear it down. When multiplied by the number of
> test classes that use this facility, that's a lot of time in the build.
> This factory assumes that the JVM is being re-used across test classes in the
> build, otherwise this pattern won't work.
> I don't think this is appropriate for every use, but I think it can be
> applicable in a great many cases - especially where developers just want a
> simple MiniCluster with 1 slave.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
