[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17468624#comment-17468624
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-26067:
-----------------------------------
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-26067-branch-2/7/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-26067-branch-2/7/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/HBASE-26067-branch-2/7/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/
JDK8 nightly jobs are both fine, general report is also good.
For me I think we could merge it back to branch-2 now.
So for the follow on issues, we could apply the patches to both master and
branch-2. The PR for HBASE-26585 is already here...
WDYT? [~elserj] [~wchevreuil].
Thanks.
> Change the way on how we track store file list
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-26067
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26067
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Components: HFile
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-3
>
>
> Open a separated jira to track the work since it can not be fully included in
> HBASE-24749.
> I think this could be a landed prior to HBASE-24749, as if this works, we
> could have different implementations for tracking store file list.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
