RussellSpitzer commented on code in PR #16088:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16088#discussion_r3230220108


##########
spark/v4.1/spark/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/source/TestSparkScan.java:
##########
@@ -1106,6 +1107,53 @@ public void testIncrementalScanDescription() throws 
Exception {
         });
   }
 

Review Comment:
   A few notes on the tests here,
   
   1.
   
   These don't seem to be in the right place. This class is for testing the 
scan object and neither of these tests actually touch the spark scan, they are 
both essentially just parsing checkings. It may be time to start a 
TestSparkReadConf file for these sorts of tests 
   
   or
   
   Actually invoke the scan here and show how the properties are changing 
things.
   
   
   2. 
   
   We should break out assertions, currently there are mutliple parse cases 
being handled in the same test.
   
   There should probably be somnething like
   
   Test Adapative enabled
   test Invalid parallelism
   Test ...
   
   3. Make sure we cover both the positive and negative cases. If we say a 
value is invalid we should have a test throwing an error when that value is 
passed. 



##########
spark/v4.1/spark/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/source/TestSparkScan.java:
##########
@@ -1106,6 +1107,53 @@ public void testIncrementalScanDescription() throws 
Exception {
         });
   }
 

Review Comment:
   A few notes on the tests here,
   
   1.
   
   These don't seem to be in the right place. This class is for testing the 
scan object and neither of these tests actually touch the spark scan, they are 
both essentially just parsing checkings. It may be time to start a 
TestSparkReadConf file for these sorts of tests 
   
   or
   
   Actually invoke the scan here and show how the properties are changing 
things.
   
   
   2. 
   
   We should break out assertions, currently there are mutliple parse cases 
being handled in the same test.
   
   There should probably be something like
   
   Test Adapative enabled
   test Invalid parallelism
   Test ...
   
   3. Make sure we cover both the positive and negative cases. If we say a 
value is invalid we should have a test throwing an error when that value is 
passed. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to