[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16451648#comment-16451648 ]
Ivan Daschinskiy commented on IGNITE-8075: ------------------------------------------ Guys. I don't mentioned, but now I'm a little bit embarrased about this fact. Why we use custom atomic counter instead of transaction's xid? > .NET: setRollbackOnTopologyChangeTimeout, withLabel, localActiveTransactions, > setTxTimeoutOnPartitionMapExchange > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-8075 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8075 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 2.4 > Reporter: Alexei Scherbakov > Assignee: Ivan Daschinskiy > Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.6 > > > Neet to add new methods as part of .NET API: > org.apache.ignite.configuration.TransactionConfiguration#txTimeoutOnPartitionMapExchange > - timeout for automatic rollback on exchange. > org.apache.ignite.IgniteTransactions#withLabel - tx label > org.apache.ignite.IgniteTransactions#localActiveTransactions - list of local > active transactions. > org.apache.ignite.IgniteCluster#setTxTimeoutOnPartitionMapExchange > Java implementation is currently available at a branch [1] > [1] https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-6827-2 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)