[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17143478#comment-17143478
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-12698:
-------------------------------------
Looks like it :-) We can close as duplicate then.
> SolrFeature: no-fq optimisation
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12698
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12698
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: contrib - LTR
> Reporter: Stanislav Livotov
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12698.patch
>
>
> [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688:
> bq. ... SolrFeature was not optimally implemented for the case when no fq
> parameter was passed. I'm not absolutely sure what was the intention to
> introduce both q(which is supposed to be a function query) and fq parameter
> for the same SolrFeature at all(Is there a case when they will be used
> together ? ), so I decided not to change behavior but just optimize described
> case ...
> (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
