[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17173239#comment-17173239
]
Christine Poerschke commented on LUCENE-8626:
---------------------------------------------
bq. Within the lucene test suite, it is nearly 90%. ...
bq. Within the solr test suite, things are less consistent: ...
What are people's thoughts on "lucene" and "solr" standardising to the same
naming, or not?
To me it seems "lucene" standardising on X and "solr" standardising on Y could
be confusing but it would still be clearer than neither of them being
standardised.
> standardise test class naming
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8626
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8626
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12939.01.patch, SOLR-12939.02.patch,
> SOLR-12939.03.patch, SOLR-12939_hoss_validation_groovy_experiment.patch
>
>
> This was mentioned and proposed on the dev mailing list. Starting this ticket
> here to start to make it happen?
> History: This ticket was created as
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12939 ticket and then got
> JIRA-moved to become https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8626 ticket.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
