dweiss commented on pull request #2094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2094#issuecomment-732161113


   I agree with Adrien - I thought (but please correct me if I'm wrong) that a 
single wrapper would be needed to keep the code compatible with existing 
indexes and dropping this wrapper would make everything work without those 
numerous calls to manual byte-shuffling in the "reverser"... I'm sorry if I 
fail to see the bigger picture here but looking at the diff it seems more 
complicated than it was before.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to