[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17421481#comment-17421481
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-10129 at 9/28/21, 4:01 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Can we also do someting for reference arrays? shallowSizeOf(Object[]) is not
possible because most arrays are not compatible. We may use generics as trick:
{{static <T> int shallowSizeOf(T[])}}
This may speedup the related issue further: LUCENE-10128 (it has a long[][]
bits, which is an array of refrences to long[] arrays).
was (Author: thetaphi):
Can we also do someting for reference arrays? shallowSizeOf(Object[]) is not
possible because most arrays are not compatible. We may use generics as trick:
{{static <T> int shallowSizeOf(T[])}}
This may speedup the related issue further:
> Add RamUsageEstimator shallowSizeOf(long[]) overload that just calls
> sizeOf(long[])?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10129
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10129
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Major
>
> See LUCENE-10128 for an example. The problem is there is only a
> {{sizeOf(long[])}}, so if the programmer uses {{shallowSizeOf}} instead of
> {{sizeOf}} then it falls back to {{shallowSizeOf(Object)}} which does a bunch
> of reflection.
> This is pretty crazy because it can create performance traps. Should we just
> add a {{shallowSizeOf(long[])}} that calls {{sizeOf(long[])}}, so that things
> are fast? (same for other primitive arrays). It would solve the problem
> easily I think.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
