[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17429252#comment-17429252 ]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-10129 at 10/15/21, 12:04 PM: -------------------------------------------------------------------- bq. I am wondering though if TestRamUsageEstimator is missing an import static org.apache.lucene.util.RamUsageEstimator.sizeOf;, so that in lines like assertEquals(sizeOf(array), sizeOf((Object) array)); the first sizeOf() calls RamUsageEstimator.sizeOf, and the second calls RamUsageTester.sizeOf. Apologies if I misunderstood the purpose of the test. I was also stumbling on this. Maybe we should remove the static import and be explicit and compare all three versions? was (Author: thetaphi): bq. I am wondering though if TestRamUsageEstimator is missing an import static org.apache.lucene.util.RamUsageEstimator.sizeOf;, so that in lines like assertEquals(sizeOf(array), sizeOf((Object) array)); the first sizeOf() calls RamUsageEstimator.sizeOf, and the second calls RamUsageTester.sizeOf. Apologies if I misunderstood the purpose of the test. I was also stumbling on this. Maybe we should remove the static import and be explicit and compare all three versions? > Add RamUsageEstimator shallowSizeOf(long[]) overload that just calls > sizeOf(long[])? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-10129 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10129 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Robert Muir > Priority: Major > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > See LUCENE-10128 for an example. The problem is there is only a > {{sizeOf(long[])}}, so if the programmer uses {{shallowSizeOf}} instead of > {{sizeOf}} then it falls back to {{shallowSizeOf(Object)}} which does a bunch > of reflection. > This is pretty crazy because it can create performance traps. Should we just > add a {{shallowSizeOf(long[])}} that calls {{sizeOf(long[])}}, so that things > are fast? (same for other primitive arrays). It would solve the problem > easily I think. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org