[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17475547#comment-17475547
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10379:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit 2f5e3c323b4db436fa6a9b3c6ee8195b6bd61431 in lucene's branch 
refs/heads/main from Greg Miller
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=2f5e3c3 ]

LUCENE-10379: Count directly into the dense values array in 
FastTaxonomyFacetCounts#countAll (#605)

Co-authored-by: guofeng.my <guofeng...@bytedance.com>

> Count directly into the values array in FastTaxonomyFacetCounts#countAl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10379
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10379
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/facet
>            Reporter: Greg Miller
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This breaks out one of the two optimizations proposed in LUCENE-10350. As 
> part of trying to track down the regressions caused by LUCENE-10350, I 
> propose we push just this one optimization independently (see LUCENE-10374).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to