[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17475550#comment-17475550
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10379:
--------------------------------------
Merged this and will watch the next nightly bench runs. Going to wait to put
anything on 9.x until we sort out the regressions.
> Count directly into the values array in FastTaxonomyFacetCounts#countAl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10379
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/facet
> Reporter: Greg Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This breaks out one of the two optimizations proposed in LUCENE-10350. As
> part of trying to track down the regressions caused by LUCENE-10350, I
> propose we push just this one optimization independently (see LUCENE-10374).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
