vsop-479 commented on code in PR #11888:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11888#discussion_r1542357624
##########
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/TestLucene99PostingsFormat.java:
##########
@@ -143,4 +141,13 @@ private void doTestImpactSerialization(List<Impact>
impacts) throws IOException
}
}
}
+
+ @Override
+ protected void subCheckBinarySearch(TermsEnum termsEnum) throws Exception {
+ // 10004a matched block's entries: [100001, 100003, ..., 100049].
+ // if target greater than the last entry of the matched block,
+ // termsEnum.term should be the last entry.
+ assertFalse(termsEnum.seekExact(new BytesRef("10004a")));
+ assertEquals(termsEnum.term(), new BytesRef("100049"));
Review Comment:
> Is there a seekCeil based test case we can make?
Yes, `seekCeil` can also omit an `AssertionError` without the fix of
7084596c1c3a62dec2614aaeb37d0954f5fbd4e2.
So i used it to replace `seekExact`. Thanks @mikemccand .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
