issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MergeObserver from IndexWriter.forceMergeDeletes() (#14515) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] ASF CI snapshot publishing fails occasionally with network failures [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] apache jenkins: Failed to save the JUnit test result [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Gradle builds slow to start [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Gradle builds slow to start [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove apache-rat dependency completely? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] More gradle cleanups [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Drop owasp tasks and plugins from the build [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Final Gradle plugins to Java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Proposal for alternate way to traverse BKD tree with prefetching matching leaves for IO concurrency [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [Build] [DO NOT MERGE YET] Refactor validation-jar checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] [DO NOT MERGE YET] Refactor validation-jar checks [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrote more Gradle plugins to java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update created version major [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update created version major [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update created version major [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update created version major [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update created version major [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update created version major [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix TestAncientIndicesCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: populate missing job timeout-minutes, fail build if missing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: populate missing job timeout-minutes, fail build if missing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: populate missing job timeout-minutes, fail build if missing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: enable zizmor online checks at night [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable zizmor online checks at night [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable zizmor online checks at night [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: disable concurrency-limits lint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: disable concurrency-limits lint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: disable concurrency-limits lint [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] SOLR-13985: Bind to localhost interface by default [lucene-solr] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SOLR-13985: Bind to localhost interface by default [lucene-solr] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 10.0.0 to 10.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 10.0.0 to 10.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump jira from 3.8.0 to 3.10.5 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump jira from 3.8.0 to 3.10.5 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.6 to 1.31.7 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.6 to 1.31.7 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.13.2 to 0.14.1 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.13.2 to 0.14.1 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.81 to 0.82 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.81 to 0.82 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: configure dependabot cooldown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: configure dependabot cooldown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: configure dependabot cooldown [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Lucene icon in Intellij [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Lucene icon in Intellij [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Lucene icon in Intellij [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix manifest content on source/javadoc artifacts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix manifest content on source/javadoc artifacts. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix manifest content on source/javadoc artifacts. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Making Vector Search Deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BackPort] Making Vector Search Deterministic [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Determinstic Vector Search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Determinstic Vector Search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Backport] Add checkDimension check to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorScorer#getRandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Backport] Add checkDimension check to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorScorer#getRandomVectorScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize bulk integer encoding with writeInts for better performance [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tidy up Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add OpenSearch to site description - slides [lucene-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add OpenSearch to site description - slides [lucene-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add OpenSearch to site description - slides [lucene-site] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve docs for some internal classes related to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15225 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add missing checkDimension check to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorScorer#getRandomVectorScorer and some cleanup [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages