[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15832286#comment-15832286
 ] 

Robert Scholte commented on MSHADE-240:
---------------------------------------

I know cases where these files are searched for on the classpath. So relocating 
will make it fail in such cases. Current behavior seems reasonable to me, also 
because it is simple: a pure merge of jar files.

> support relocation pom.properties and pom.xml descriptors in shaded jars
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MSHADE-240
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-240
>             Project: Maven Shade Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.3
>            Reporter: Thomas Mortagne
>            Assignee: Robert Scholte
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> When using shade plugin to embbed (and relocate to be safe) some dependency 
> the final jar ends up with the dependency 
> {{/META-INF/maven/<groupid>/<artifactid>/*}} files.
> The problem is that in the final jars those files essentially become a lie 
> for any tools looking at those descriptors to find out what the jar contains 
> and you end up with false positive.
> Ideally they should be stripped when relocating a dependency since it means 
> the jar does not contain what is indicated in those files anymore, only 
> something that happen to have the same feature but with completely different 
> packages (so unusable). An alternative is to move them in some other place 
> like {{/META-INF/shade/maven/<groupid>/<artifactid>/*}} for example, so that 
> you still keep information about what has been shaded.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to