[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17792376#comment-17792376
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MSHARED-1285:
-----------------------------------------
lalmeras opened a new pull request, #83:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-filtering/pull/83
(this is a follow-up to #77)
Current incremental build does not honor isUptodate(), so changed or removed
target resources are not refreshed until sources are modified or a full build
is performed.
2 new testcases exhibits this issue (one for missing target resource, one
for modified target resource). As stub BuildContext provides appropriate
isUptodate results, build should refresh this resources.
Current implementation prevents BuildContext implementors to trigger
appropriate resource refresh by tweaking isUptodate implementation.
See javadoc in BuildContext#newScanner javadoc that advices that incremental
build may be performed with a full resource scanning and a isUptodate call to
refresh only needed resources.
Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:
- [x] Make sure there is a [JIRA
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED) filed
for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial
changes like typos do not
require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this
issue, without
pulling in other changes.
- [x] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line
and body.
- [x] Format the pull request title like `[MSHARED-XXX] - Fixes bug in
ApproximateQuantiles`,
where you replace `MSHARED-XXX` with the appropriate JIRA issue. Best
practice
is to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the
first line of the
commit message.
- [x] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to
understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
- [x] Run `mvn clean verify -Prun-its` to make sure basic checks pass. A
more thorough check will
be performed on your pull request automatically.
If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
[Individual Contributor License
Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf) if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.
To make clear that you license your contribution under
the [Apache License Version 2.0, January
2004](http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.
- [x] I hereby declare this contribution to be licensed under the [Apache
License Version 2.0, January 2004](http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
- [ ] In any other case, please file an [Apache Individual Contributor
License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf).
> DefaultMavenResourcesFiltering uses BuildContext in a way that fails sometimes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSHARED-1285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1285
> Project: Maven Shared Components
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Christoph Läubrich
> Priority: Major
>
> The maven resources plugin uses
> [https://github.com/apache/maven-filtering/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/shared/filtering/DefaultMavenResourcesFiltering.java]
> to copy resources, but that component has some subtile flaws reported here:
> [https://github.com/eclipse-m2e/m2e-core/discussions/1468]
> The problematic part is the usage of BuildContext#newScanner that already
> mentions in the javadoc that passing ignoreDelta to neScanner might not
> reveal all required items +*for copy-resources*+ form A -> B and instead
> BuildContext#isUpTodate should be used.
> Just from a quick look I assume that part of code actually wants to use
> something like this:
> {code:java}
> DirectoryScanner ds = new DirectoryScanner() {
> @Override
> protected boolean isSelected(String name, File file) {
> if (file.isFile() && buildContext.isUptodate(getTargetFile(file), file))
> {
> return false;
> }
> return true;
> }
> };
> ds.setBasedir(basedir); {code}
> That way all the code that currently checks for if output directory existed
> before can also be removed what is another issue because it leads to a full
> resources copy even if source+target are already even if a single class file
> is changed while the idea seems more that if the output was not there it
> should not try to be incremental!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
