[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=350930#comment-350930
]
David Hoffer commented on MNG-3092:
-----------------------------------
Scott, wow I didn't know the reasons why this is still lacking attention after
all those years..totally mishandled is an understatement indeed. But what I
still don't understand is why did they not think it was in their best interest
to take action? Are they trying to kill Maven? I know Maven is loosing
interest in the companies & departments I work in because there are too many
things, like this, that either don't work or have so many warts that folks just
get frustrated and swear they will never use Maven again...is that what the
Maven team is looking for?
> resolution of version ranges with non-snapshot bounds can resolve to a
> snapshot version
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3092
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3092
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Dependencies
> Reporter: Mark Hobson
> Assignee: Jason van Zyl
> Fix For: 3.2.x
>
> Attachments: MNG-3092.patch, MNG-3092.patch
>
>
> Contrary to the 2.0 design docs:
> "Resolution of dependency ranges should not resolve to a snapshot
> (development version) unless it is included as an explicit boundary."
> -- from
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Dependency+Mediation+and+Conflict+Resolution#DependencyMediationandConflictResolution-Incorporating%7B%7BSNAPSHOT%7D%7Dversionsintothespecification
> The following is equates to true:
> VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec( "[1.0,1.1]" ).containsVersion( new
> DefaultArtifactVersion( "1.1-SNAPSHOT" ) )
> The attached patch only allows snapshot versions to be contained in a range
> if they are equal to one of the boundaries. Note that this is a strict
> equality, so [1.0,1.2-SNAPSHOT] will not contain 1.1-SNAPSHOT.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)
