exceptionfactory commented on PR #10102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/10102#issuecomment-3098307187

   > > ... on initial consideration, creating an extra empty FlowFile does not 
sound like a good approach, as it could disrupt existing flow expectations.
   > 
   > @exceptionfactory Could you open up a little, in what sense would it 
distrupt the existing flow expectations?
   > 
   > We would also put it behind a switch, so `ExecuteSQL` and 
`ExecuteSQLRecord` would then both have a new property, like 'Add EOF Flow 
File' or 'Add Sentinel Flow File', with true/false settings, by default set to 
false. So unless it is intentionally turned on, these processors would behave 
the original way.
   > 
   > I have some concerns about the current approach, because it is a bit 
complicated with this Flow File delaying + migrating between sessions solution. 
Adding an extra Flow File is simpler, and simpler is usually better from 
maintenance perspective. What do you think?
   
   @takraj Writing an empty FlowFile could be disruptive for existing flows 
that expect to receive FlowFiles containing at least one result. Some flow 
designs may be built to handle empty FlowFiles, others may not.
   
   Adding a new property could be one way to implement this feature in a 
compatible way, so that could be considered. However, introducing new 
properties adds some level of complexity for the flow designer, which is more 
important to consider than code complexity.
   
   With that being said, transferring FlowFiles between ProcessSessions raises 
some implementation questions. I need to take a closer look at the 
implementation details, but at the moment it is not clear why it is necessary 
to create more than one session. Is it not possible to set the attribute on the 
last of Result Set FlowFiles before transferring?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to