hunyadi-dev commented on a change in pull request #784:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/784#discussion_r431862488



##########
File path: libminifi/test/script-tests/ExecutePythonProcessorTests.cpp
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,276 @@
+/**
+ *
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#define CATCH_CONFIG_MAIN
+
+#include <memory>
+#include <string>
+#include <set>
+
+#include "../TestBase.h"
+
+#include "processors/GetFile.h"
+#include "python/ExecutePythonProcessor.h"
+#include "processors/LogAttribute.h"
+#include "processors/PutFile.h"
+#include "utils/file/FileUtils.h"
+
+namespace {
+
+#include <unistd.h>
+#define GetCurrentDir getcwd
+
+std::string GetCurrentWorkingDir(void) {
+  char buff[FILENAME_MAX];
+  GetCurrentDir(buff, FILENAME_MAX);
+  std::string current_working_dir(buff);
+  return current_working_dir;
+}
+
+class ExecutePythonProcessorTestBase {
+ public:
+    ExecutePythonProcessorTestBase() :
+      logTestController_(LogTestController::getInstance()),
+      
logger_(logging::LoggerFactory<org::apache::nifi::minifi::python::processors::ExecutePythonProcessor>::getLogger())
 {
+      reInitialize();
+    }
+    virtual ~ExecutePythonProcessorTestBase() {
+      logTestController_.reset();
+      logTestController_.setDebug<TestPlan>();
+      
logTestController_.setDebug<minifi::python::processors::ExecutePythonProcessor>();
+      logTestController_.setDebug<minifi::processors::PutFile>();
+      logTestController_.setDebug<minifi::processors::PutFile::ReadCallback>();
+    }
+
+ protected:
+    void reInitialize() {
+      testController_.reset(new TestController());
+      plan_ = testController_->createPlan();
+    }
+
+    std::string createTempDir() {
+      char dirtemplate[] = "/tmp/gt.XXXXXX";
+      std::string temp_dir = testController_->createTempDirectory(dirtemplate);
+      REQUIRE(!temp_dir.empty());
+      struct stat buffer;
+      REQUIRE(-1 != stat(temp_dir.c_str(), &buffer));
+      REQUIRE(S_ISDIR(buffer.st_mode));
+      return temp_dir;
+    }
+
+    std::string putFileToDir(const std::string& dir_path, const std::string& 
file_name, const std::string& content) {
+      std::string file_path(dir_path + utils::file::FileUtils::get_separator() 
+ file_name);
+      std::ofstream out_file(file_path);
+      if (out_file.is_open()) {
+        out_file << content;
+        out_file.close();
+      }
+      return file_path;
+    }
+
+    std::string createTempDirWithFile(const std::string& file_name, const 
std::string& content) {
+      std::string temp_dir = createTempDir();
+      putFileToDir(temp_dir, file_name, content);
+      return temp_dir;
+    }
+
+    std::string getFileContent(const std::string& file_name) {
+      std::ifstream file_handle(file_name);
+      REQUIRE(file_handle.is_open());
+      const std::string file_content{ 
(std::istreambuf_iterator<char>(file_handle)), 
(std::istreambuf_iterator<char>())};
+      file_handle.close();
+      return file_content;
+    }

Review comment:
       I would argue that the workflow would not be any more reusable, as a 
having a `TestController` is a dependency either way. Also, I would rather have 
the REQUIRE assertions inside the test-helper function for two reasons:
    - Someone can easily forget adding EXPECT_THROW on the call side ending up 
accidentaly satisfying "EXPECT_THROW" calls on an upper call stack.
    - Adding the expectation for throwing would make the code would look like 
we test the helper functions inside of unit tests, and might not be obvious why 
is there an expectation for not throwing for a given test.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to