cpoerschke commented on code in PR #1056: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1056#discussion_r990344371
########## solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SchemaCodecFactory.java: ########## @@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ import org.apache.lucene.codecs.DocValuesFormat; import org.apache.lucene.codecs.KnnVectorsFormat; import org.apache.lucene.codecs.PostingsFormat; -import org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92.Lucene92Codec; -import org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92.Lucene92Codec.Mode; -import org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene92.Lucene92HnswVectorsFormat; Review Comment: Hmm, the #960 branch was called `lucene-9.2` and maybe non-use of 9.3 there was for a good reason? Could this mean in turn that Lucene 9.4 for Solr 9.1 could be re-considered? @chatman and @madrob - tagging you here as release manager and #960 author and then with more context the question could/should be brought to the dev list for wider consideration? WDYT? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
