epugh commented on PR #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2177#issuecomment-1894206680
How much do you hate the idea of not having `storeType`?? Could we just
have two methods, one where it's `/core/{name}/select` and the other is
`/collection/{name}/select`? Could we side step the issue of the name by jsut
having two paths?
Barring somehow being able to avoid the name, I think I like `IndexType`
better. I went and looked at the Ref Guide hoping for inspiration, and
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/getting-started/introduction.html
says _In addition to providing a network accessible engine for Lucene based
document retrieval, Solr provides the ability to scale beyond the limitations
of a single machine. Indexes can be sharded and replicated for performance and
reliability, using either one of two [Solr Cluster
Types](https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guide/cluster-types.html).
One type of cluster requires no supporting infrastructure, and instances are
managed directly by administrators. The second type uses [Apache
ZookeeperTM](https://zookeeper.apache.org/) to coordinate management activities
across the cluster._. It interestingly doesn't say *collection* or *core* ;-).
So that would be an argument for the `IndexType`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
