[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17882198#comment-17882198
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-17256:
-------------------------------------

Another approach would be for Http2SolrClient.withBaseUrl to take only the URL 
and _return_ a SolrClient that is scoped to that URL.  Close would no-op; it'd 
hold no resources other than a reference back to the original Http2SolrClient.  
requestAsync should perhaps be a base method on SolrClient.

> Remove SolrRequest.getBasePath setBasePath
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17256
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17256
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SolrJ
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newdev, pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> SolrRequest has a getBasePath & setBasePath.  The naming is poor; it's the 
> URL base to the Solr node like "http://localhost:8983/solr";.  It's only 
> recognized by HttpSolrClient; LBSolrClient (used by CloudSolrClient) ignores 
> it and will in fact mutate the passed in request to its liking, which is 
> rather ugly because it means a request cannot be used concurrently if the 
> user wants to.  But moreover I think there's a conceptual discordance of 
> placing this concept on SolrRequest given that some clients want to route 
> requests to nodes *they* choose.  I propose removing this from SolrRequest 
> and instead adding a method specific to HttpSolrClient.  Almost all existing 
> usages of setBasePath immediately execute the request on an HttpSolrClient, 
> so should be easy to change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to