mkhludnev commented on PR #2742: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2742#issuecomment-2456782850
> you can already achieve the desired results using the existing mechanism `type:func` I'm made a simple experiment. ~~this time, you won't drop my commit~~ Mind the file location, I wish to build in a code snippet into RefGuide! Meanwhile, strawman approach with funcs, doesn not let custom parser to read a nested map (ok it let it read,but only stringified). Also, custom parser has no access to a parent facet parser, it might be necessary for parsing nested facets, but maybe FacetParser might be instantiated right there, haven't check it yet. https://github.com/mkhludnev/solr/commit/85870c467a0ffb038f45280c7a4bde58a4237b0e#diff-01a34eb1905d3f728ae9cb3d433945541b5a69fbe02e3f8da21ccd38ebe859edR148 The q no. 1 are we ok with the scope limited by `type:func` hook, in this case, are facet parser changes necessary? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
