epugh commented on PR #4073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4073#issuecomment-3807940889
> > we are making it clearer that ImplicitPlugins.json is specfic to a
configset and not a node/container scoped file.
>
> We already have a way for users to specify which plugins should be made
available on a core-by-core basis: solrconfig.xml. When should/would a user
choose to specify a configset-level ImplicitPlugins.json vs. defining their
plugin in solrconfig.xml the way we've always supported? It just feels a little
redundant, though maybe I'm not grokking the usecase.
@dsmiley Jason and I chatted, and one thing we wondered is what if added
something like this to Solrconfig handling versus a whole new file...:
```
<requestHandler name="/update/csv"
startup="disabled"
/>
```
and if you saw that, then it didn't get loaded. Could do something similar
for for queryResponseWriters:
```
<queryResponseWriter name="xslt"
startup="disabled"
/>
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
