dsmiley commented on code in PR #4475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4475#discussion_r3330829251
##########
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/join/FiltersQParser.java:
##########
@@ -59,7 +59,14 @@ protected BooleanQuery parseImpl() throws SyntaxError {
BooleanQuery.Builder builder = createBuilder();
for (Map.Entry<QParser, Occur> clause : clauses.entrySet()) {
- builder.add(unwrapQuery(clause.getKey().getQuery(), clause.getValue()),
clause.getValue());
+
+ Query query = clause.getKey().getQuery();
+ Occur occur = clause.getValue();
+
+ if (occur == Occur.SHOULD && query instanceof BooleanQuery boolQ &&
boolQ.clauses().isEmpty()) {
Review Comment:
yes; try it any ways. We'll see. It'll be interesting to see if there are
test failures that make assumptions.
Seems SolrQueryParserBase.newFieldQuery is a good spot for this change. Or
override Lucene level createFieldQuery as it's the lowest spot we can do and it
should cover a wider net.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
