On 9/17/07, Scheper, Erik-Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The proposed voting order seems ok to me. > > Please note that I didn't say that the 2.0 final release should be done > as an incubator project; I was just wondering what's customary.
That's fine, we appreciate your participation in the community. Notwithstanding my previous post, I would love to see ivy graduated as > an ant subproject. I use it (almost) every day... Thanks, satisfied users is the best reward for the time spent on the project! Xavier Erik-Berndt > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Gilles Scokart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: maandag 17 september 2007 11:11 > Aan: [email protected] > Onderwerp: RE: What about Graduation? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: lundi 17 septembre 2007 10:41 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: What about Graduation? > > > > On 9/17/07, Scheper, Erik-Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Before starting a vote thread, wouldn't it be better to clear some > > > outstanding issues: -Is it still intended to graduate as an ant > > > subproject? (I seem to remember that I read this some time ago) > > > > > > We agreed on graduating as an Ant subproject a few months ago: > > http://www.nabble.com/Destination-upon-graduation-%28was-Re%3A-Steps- > > toward-graduation%29-tf3882862.html#a11004970 > > > > You are right, we were all agreeing on that. But that should be > formalized with a vote. Isn't it? > > Also, a vote the ant-dev mailing list will be required. > > But I'm not sure in which order we should make those votes... I propose > > 1. Vote here on destination after graduation > 2. Ask for a vote on the ant-dev mailing list (if vote 1. result is as > expected) > 3. Fire the vote here to decide if we are ready to graduate (if the > result of vote 2. is as expected, and depending on the outcomes of this > discussion) 4. If ok, ask the vote on the incubator list. > > > > > > > -Wouldn't it be better to wait until an incubating release (better > > than > > > alpha-2) is complete? The beta-1 release has been delayed for some > > > time now > > > > > > I personnally don't think so. Graduation is not about code quality or > > release quality. We have demonstrated we are able to make releases. > > Being late on a release is a problem we frequently encounter in an > > open source project. Committers sometime have less time than expected > > to work on a release, but I don't think it's too much a problem, the > > community is still there, answering questions, and developing the > > upcoming version. And I would really prefer to make the 2.0 final > > version as a graduated project. > > > > I have the same understanding. > > > > Gilles > > > > Disclaimer: > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential > and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It is > intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, > disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you > receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and > delete all copies of this message. > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
