Hi Eric, The pretty printing is being done by the Xalan serializer now (presumably what you're seeing is the behaviour it's always had). If you have suggestions on improvements please make them on the Xalan-J users list. Previous discussion on this topic is available here [1] and here [2].
Thanks. [1] http://www.nabble.com/Fomatting-question-serializing-DOM-with-pretty-print-tf3252607.html [2] http://marc.info/?t=117578219700002&r=1&w=2 Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Eric Kolotyluk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/28/2007 12:01:40 PM: > Why is the pretty printing using LSSerializer so bad compared to > XMLSerializer (which is deprecated)? > > Are there any plans to improve it? If you can make XMLSerializer > work properly you should be able to make LSSerializer work properly. > > It?s hard to justify moving away from the deprecated API when the > alternate is so much worse ? the other developers will hate me > because our XML logs will look awful. > > Cheers, Eric --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
