Catching up on this thread quite late, but ... On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > > It's a pity if I have to change the name ... I would of course very much > prefer to keep it. But I can see your point. Let's wait for others to > comment on that. > The formal way to check Sun's position on this would be to send mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- but I've already seen indications that "J2EEUnit" would be problematic because Sun asserts a trademark on "J2EE". The folks at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address might have some suggestions on what would be found acceptable; I suggest you write them and ask about it. Craig McClanahan
- J2EEUnit under the GPL? Peter Donald
- Re: J2EEUnit under the GPL? Vincent Massol
- Re: J2EEUnit under the GPL? Vincent Massol
- [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to A... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to A... Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit dona... Ted Husted
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit dona... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to ASF Kevin A. Burton
- Re: [PROPOSAL] J2EEUnit donation to A... Ted Husted
- cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/j2eeunit/web/sampl... vmassol