Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "jakarta-commons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 2:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] build structure jakarta-commons
>
> > As I warned Geir I would :-), I've got a different set of preferences for
> > build procedures to suggest. Anyone who has followed along on TOMCAT-DEV
> > and GENERAL knows that I'm not a fan of checking JAR files in to the
> > repositories. Having a common build/lib directory, as Geir suggests
> > below, is better than having ant.jar checked into every single Commons
> > package, but IMHO it will lead to conflicts over versions of the shared
> > JARs (I need Ant 1.3, someone else needs Ant 1.2, and so on).
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> +1 on all that as this is also my belief and what I have also done in
> Cactus.
How many other jars do I have to go get to use it? I assume you managed
to keep things limited to one version of Ant, so that's one. Then, I
assume that I have to go find JUnit. That's two. What else?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
